Rhetorical Analysis †“Why Chinese Mothers Are Superior” Essay

P atomic number 18nting is always a debatable topic in America. every(prenominal) person has an opinion on how a sister should be elevated and disciplined. In Amy Chuas Why Chinese Mothers ar Superior (an excerpt from Battle hymn of the Tiger Mother), Chua explains Chinese adverting and how it is efficacious in her life. She contains that by breaking blue a infant and pushing them to their full potential, the child will, in turn, be confident and implausibly prosperous. Through the use of several rhetorical devices, Chua upholds, as well as weakens, her claim and expresses a different, controversial way of fostering.An substantial ingredient in Chuas course is her ethos. She is clearly an intellectual individual, given that she is a professor at Yale University. Putting a position her credentials, this try out brings forth a trenchant character. From the start, she identifies herself as a tough and fastidious Chinese mother. Throughout the musical composition s he uses several personal experiences that support this assertion. The referee recognizes a sense of confidence from Chua as she repeatedly credit lines westbound-parenting cerebrationls from Chinese-parenting predilectionls. As far as her credibility as an author, it is questionable. She writes, Chinese parents study that their kids owe them everything.The reason for this is a curt unclear Her credibility begins to slip when she uses the raillery unclear. This statement suggests that she does not counterbalance know herself why she is parenting the way she is parenting. It in any case presents a perfect opportunity for contend people to induct an statement against Chuas style of parenting. Another instance where Chuas credibility becomes uncertain is when she writes of mimicking her husband when he intervenes in a dispute mingled with her and their daughter. It shows that she is unwilling to tendencyen to the other side of her affirmation and has this my-way-or-the -highway complexwhich is not needs an attractive outlook to have. It seems that an author who is escaped to looking at both sides of anargument is a to a greater extent(prenominal) respectable author.Chuas use of pathos is particularly insensitive. She uses it more to take a jab at Western culture rather than to make an raise on either side. several(prenominal) times Chua makes up these hypothetical scenarios and discusses what Western parents would do and then what Chinese parents would do. Her idea of how Western parents react is seemingly asleep(predicate) on but there is a sarcastic tone intimately it. What is in reality interesting well-nigh her emotional put forward is that she quotes her husband who opposes one aspect of her argument. He says, Children dont choose their parentsso its the parents responsibility to provide for them, which is an address to Western parents. She immediately shuts his argument down but fails to explain why it is a terrible deal for the Wes tern parent. This wholly weakens her claim because, again, she is not being open-minded. In the end, Chua makes a very general appeal by saying, All in good order parents unavoidableness to do whats beaver for their children. It is confuse because this statement somewhat qualifies her claim. First, she refutes Western parenting, then, comes acantha to say that Western and Chinese parents are all one in the same(p) in the way that they care for their children. Chuas motive is unclear.Beyond Chuas heavy opinions, she utilizes statistics and facts in her argument. The statistics at the pedigree of the blame describe percentages of Western and Chinese mothers who agree that stressing pedantic success is not unassailable for children or that parents need to foster the idea that learning is fun. The outcome showed that 0% of Chinese mothers agreed and they, instead, valued the idea of successful children resulting from successful parenting. These types of statistics definitely support Chuas Chinese mother persona. The statistics as well back up her claim of how much time Chinese parents put into helpering their children make pedantic achievements. It is difficult to argue with facts and data, however, Chua does not name the sources of this data. For all the reader knows, she could have make it up. It may be a more functional logical appeal if the studies she quotes were from a well-known and respected source.Chuas pickaxe of language reflects possible exaggeration on Chuas behalf andconfusion for the reader. It makes sense to exaggerate in order to stress the microscope stage she is trying to make but it also triggers the reader to doubt and question, which does not help her cause. Referring to her daughter, she writes, calling her garbagewhen she acted exceedingly disrespectfully toward me. The idea of someone acting extremely disrespectfully varies from person to person. It is very prejudice statement. at that place is no way to represent how her daughter was really acting. Already having examples of Chuas ethos from this penning, it is practical to assume she is exaggerating. Chuas diction is also troubling, especially when she writes, All decent parents hope to do whats best for their children. What are decent parents and what is best for any child? She does not elaborate on these key terms. It is the beginning of an argument on definition. Like in the case of Chuas exaggeration, there is no way to regularize what qualities a good parent has. There is no way for every parent to agree on a list of things that are best for children.Another proficiency the author uses to get her point crosswise is repetition. Numerous times finishedout her essay Chua repeats two words at the beginning of a sentence, By contrast She is do it very clear that there are differences between Western parents and Chinese parents. This is effective because the reader is constantly reminded that these two types of parents are not comparabl e in Chuas mind. There is also a consequence of repetition in terms of actions of the author. It seems interchangeable there is a cycle of Chinese parenting in her life. She raised her daughters the way her parents raised her. Chuas father called her garbage when she acted strange and Chua called her daughter garbage when she acted inappropriate. This cycle of Chinese parenting indicates that Chinese culture is unchanging or very hard to change. Overall, through repetition, the reader gets a good sense of tell apart cultures.The intended auditory sense for this argument is an element worth discussing. Chua was most likely aiming this flip specifically at Western parents. The argument is definitely eye-catching to any parent and is compelling enough to offset disagreement. Chua seems to want that reaction because the purpose of her essay was to contrast Chinese parenting and Western parenting andexplain how Chinese parenting is more effectivein her opinion. It just about seem s as though she wants to rub it in the faces of Western parents, maybe even spark guilt. The effect she wants to have on her audience may be for them think about her claim and reevaluate their methods of parenting.As mentioned before, Chua claims that by criticizing a child and hammering academic success into his or her brain the child will grow to become a prosperous and confident person. Her purpose gets through to the audience but does not of necessity persuade them. She utilizes rhetorical devices that both support and weaken her argument. Chuas lifestyle is a result of how she was raised. In a sense, her piece is a great lesson for Western cultures about Chinese culture. Chua may or may not effectively explain why Chinese mothers are superior but, ultimately, she conveys a unique, if not totally outrageous, idea of parenting direct at the average Western parents.