Hamlet: Divine Intervention and the Natural Order Essay

The graduation exercise go against of the theory is that of miraculous Intervention this universe the easier of the both parts to explain.This works off the idea that some manner of God or All-Powerful might does actually exist. Divine Intervention is, therefore, the notion that this God tolerate manipulate the demesne either through direct or indirect action.In the textual matter and film, for instance, the obsess comes as a messenger from this God, incite hamlet to do its will. This is both an example of direct divine intervention in the appearance of the Ghost and indirect divine intervention as the God uses settlement to carry out its deeds.The second part of the concept is the graphic nightspot of the world. This can be brought down to its base form as What is supposed(p) to happen. Unfortunately, it isnt that simple. The infixed methodicalness exists always, however is not always followed. This breaking away from the Order is normally the result of Human I ntervention, developing one of two outcomes.These are either the Natural Order is re-aligned, or the world remains a corrupt and terrible place until such time as the first outcome is realised. So, the world is repaired, or an unending loop of badness ensues until it is.In the operate, the Order was broken when Claudius killed officefulness crossroads, and from the opening lines the wrongness that lingers in the air is noted, setting the mood for the remainder of the play tis bitter rimed and I am sick at heart. (I,1,8-9) said Francisco as he was relieved from watch-duty. Also, in the film, these lecture are greatly aided in their purpose by the images of snow-covered Denmark. Another line, in the after part act something is rotten in the press out of Denmark (I.4.67) reaffirms this mood and goes further to place Franciscos sickness at heart down to a rottenness in Denmark.Now, how the world is realigned with the Natural Order is the link digest to the first part of the conc ept Humans are the creatures, knowingly or unknowingly, that fix the problems that throw the world out of Order in thefirst place. In hamlet, this is the case. Without Divine Intervention, however, Denmark would have remained in a state of malaiseThe Ghost, you see, gave Hamlet the one piece of information that was needed to manipulate him into action That his father, mightiness Hamlet, had been murdered. With this knowledge, Hamlet was able to mould his grief into anger albeit slowly and fulfill the will of the God by realigning the Natural Order in Denmark. in that location are two parallels running the first from King Fortinbras to Fortinbras and the second from King Hamlet to Hamlet. Both are disrupted, causing not one, entirely two interlocking lines of Natural Order to be upset. This is, perhaps, the reason Divine Intervention was necessary to fix it Claudiuss murder of King Hamlet gave him power not only over Denmark, but Poland as well.As can be seen, the major tone t hat the concept of Divine Intervention and Natural Order can be related to is, or course, Hamlet. He is the most interconnected character in the text the manipulated being used indirectly by God, and also the one to realign the natural order. But why? This quote, from Philip Edwards, explains What is unendurable to heaven is not to be endured by men. Evil is not ineradicable, and heaven may appoint an agent of its skilfulice to pluck it out Hamlet.Thus, Hamlet is Divine Justice, charged by the Ghost of his Father a messenger from God to cleanse Denmark of evil. vindicate his foul and unnatural murder. (I,5,71) And he goes about it with a passion. From Philip Edwards essay this quote is taken The go he hears gives him his mission, which he rapidly expands into a cleansing of the world, a setting right of disjointed time. As the scourge and minister of heaven, he willfully seeks his own salvation by flailing others with his tongue for their moral inadequacies and redirecting the ir lives as he moves forward to a killing which will re-baptise the state of Denmark. To which I add, not just one, but seven killings.The re alliance of the Natural Order is realised in the final scene in thefinal act, just before Hamlets expiry The rest is silence. (V,2) As there is no definite in-text credit that the Natural Order was upset, conclusions can be drawn from other lines, the descriptor of rottenness in Demark being one of them. And so it is that, although there is no line saying The world is now in alignment with the Natural Order, we can say The rest is silence is the realisation that the world is right again. There is no more chaos, no trouble, just peace usually equated with silence and calm.The major impact of the Divine Intervention and Natural Order theory is upon the audiences perception of the play after its conclusion. The ascendent view taken is that Hamlet, although achieving his goal of revenge, yardd a chaotic mess of cobblers last that was, in itse lf, meaningless. This view lends itself to a play-given moral of revenge is bad or some other similarly droll statement of absolutes.When applying the text to the Natural Order theory, the deaths of the six apparently innocent characters Gertrude, Polonius, Ophelia, Laertes, Rosencrantz and Gildenstern can be justified. All were wronged by Claudiuss misdeed, all were in the wrong in some part, and thus, all had been moved out of the Natural Order even if it was without choice.Their deaths are integral to the realignment of the Order if they remain, the corruption lingers also. In death, they are no longer tools of Claudius who is the cause of the disruption and do not obstruct Hamlets duty as divine justice. preferably than a purposeless bloodbath, the deaths of the six were actually a necessity to achieving peace and new OrderGertrude had married her brother-in-law, and it is quite likely had been seeing him before the death of King Hamlet. Incest, in the time of Hamlet (and, of course, in the current time) was looked upon with great distaste and marrying ones brother-in-law was seen as incest unlike now.Rosencrantz and Gildenstern had been enlisted by Claudius to spy on Hamlet and gauge his madness. Spying is an immoral act, and their doing so, even if enlisted by Claudius, put them in line for a cosmic spanking.Polonius had spied on Hamlet as well as having plotted with Claudius to partake in many some other(prenominal) misdeeds. His faults are, perhaps, the most blatant.Laertes, after the death of his father, consents to follow the whim of Claudius and poison Hamlet. A big mistake, for he ends up taking the life of another human a cardinal sin.Lastly, Ophelia although there is no hard severalize in the play, she may have slept with Hamlet. If this is the case, and sex before marriage is her wrong, then Shakespeares seek for evil and successive eradication of it was very thorough.As well as altering the perception of the audience, the play its elf can be viewed in a new light Shakespeares Hamlet had yet another underlying meaning. Along with concepts of revenge, ambition, love, marriage, gender, class structure, morality, betrayal and deceit, appearances and reality and madness, the idea that evil does not go unpunished can be expounded to include God as a punisher, hunting down every gnomish transgression and demanding payment in triplicate payable with ones eternal soul.Finally, what about Hamlets death? I hear you ask. Charged with the responsibility of divine justice, it would seem wrong that he should die, right? His death was one big accident, occurring because Laertes was persuaded by Claudius to poison the sword he used to fight Hamlet.No. such(prenominal) a simple and slack answer does not support the theory of Divine Intervention and Natural Order. Hamlets death was also necessary to fixing a jaded world.As can be seen from the flowchart, King Fortinbras power passed to King Hamlet with his death not to Fortin bras as must be assumed it would have.When Claudius gained power, not one, but two Kings had been wronged their command stolen by evil.Hamlet dying, after killing Claudius and retrieving the power of the Kings, was the final piece in the puzzle. Control passed to Fortinbras the only major character not to have connected acts of poor judgement (to put it lightly), and the Natural Order was truly repaired. Both Denmark and Poland had a ruler of rectitude and the eternal loop of badness could be overcome, allowing the world to move into new times of industry and wonder.BibliographyCoyle, M., (ed.) (1992) Hamlet Contemporary Critical Essays, Macmillan Education Ltd, London.Muir, K., Wells, S., (ed.) (1980) Aspects of Hamlet, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Shakespeare, W., (ed.) Ridley, M. R., (1964) The Tragedy of Hamlet, Mackays of Chatham.Stockton, C. L., (2000) CliffsNotes on Shakespeares Hamlet, Wiley Publishing Inc., New York.